Delayed Pet Food Recall Leads to Lawsuit

A recall of pet food products manufactured by Menu Foods was recently announced, pulling 60 million containers of dog and cat food that may be deadly to pets.  Read the full story by clicking on this link.

Unfortunately for some pet owners, the recall apparently came too late as their pets consumed the recalled products and fell ill or even died as a result.  In the case of one such Chicago woman, Dawn Majerczyk, her cat’s death has led to a lawsuit against Menu Foods.  This lawsuit may even balloon into a class action lawsuit. 

What is interesting about this case is the question of what potential causes of action exist against Menu Foods.  Such plaintiff pet owners likely did not personally suffer any physical injuries as a result of the contaminated pet food, or the delay of recalling the products.  Perhaps Ms. Majerczyk suffered emotional damage, but beyond emotional trauma, no harm to her person likely occurred. 

As discussed in previous Law in Life posts, we have discussed that negligence is a cause of action that may be raised from the breach of a duty, which in turn, causes damages.  These damages do not necessarily have to be bodily damage to a person, but may also be damages to personal property.  And in this case, since pets are considered personal property, negligence may be an appropriate cause of action, if Menu Foods breached some duty it owed to Ms. Majerczyk or other similar pet owners.

There is also the potential cause of action of strict products liability.  Under a theory of strict products liability, a manufacturer may be liable for damages caused by its product if the product was defectively designed or manufactured, or if a warning label is defective.  However, a strict products liability cause of action is only generally applied when the harm is caused to a human being.

This will definitely be an interesting case to follow, but as we have seen in the past, such high-publicity cases usually never make it to trial, and are instead settled out of court.

Advertisements

One Response to Delayed Pet Food Recall Leads to Lawsuit

  1. STACEY GASKINS says:

    MY HAT GOES OFF TO DAWN MAJERCZYK. I WILL BE FOLLOWING IN HER FOOTSTEPS. MY CAT ALSO HAD TO BE PUT TO SLEEP AFTER EATING THE RECALLED CONTAMINATED FOOD/NUTRIPLAN/SLICED CHICKEN W/GRAY. HE WAS HOSPITALIZED ON MARCH 12, 2007 AND HAD TO BE PUT TO SLEEP DUE TO RENAL FAILURE ON MARCH 14, 2007. I THEN HEARD OF THE RECALL ON MARCH 16, 2007. I STILL HAVE THE CAN 1/2 FILLED WITH FOOD THAT HAS THE SAME LOT NUMBERS OF THE RECALLED PRODUCT. ALSO I HAVE RECEIPTS OF WHEN AND WHERE I PURCHASED THIS FOOD. I AM PRESENLY LOOKING FOR AN ATTORNEY IN PHILADELPHIA TO HANDLE THIS CASE. I HAVE ALL THE EVIDENCE. I BELIEVE MENUE FOODS SHOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR MY COSTS, EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, AND GROSS NEGLIGENCE.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: